PainRelief.com Interview with: Lauren R. Gorfinkel MPH New York State Psychiatric Institute New York, NY Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia Vancouver, Canada
PainRelief.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: The opioid crisis has led to clear declines in opioid prescribing across North America, however, chronic pain remains an extremely common health problem with limited treatment options. This study was therefore interested in using nationally-representative data to find out whether alternative pain medications are growing more popular as opioid prescriptions decline.
PainRelief.com Interview with: Peggy Compton, RN, PhD, FAAN Professor and van Ameringen Endowed Chair Program Director, Hillman Scholars in Nursing Innovation Department of Family and Community Health University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing Philadelphia, PA 19104
Dr. Compton
PainRelief.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: Patients with substance use disorders are highly likely to leave the hospital against medical advice (AMA) or self-discharge, putting them at risk for poorer health outcomes including progressing illness, readmissions, and even death. Inadequate pain management is identified as a potential motivator of self-discharge in this patient population. The objective of these secondary analyses was to describe the association between acute and chronic pain and AMA discharges among persons with opioid-related conditions.
PainRelief.com: What are the main findings?
Response: The main findings were that 16% of the 7,972 admissions involving opioid-related conditions culminated in an AMA discharge, which was more than five times higher than in the general population. Self-directed discharge rates were positively associated with polysubstance use, nicotine dependence, depression, and homelessness. Among the 955 patients with at least one self-directed discharge, 15.4% had up to 16 additional self-directed discharges during the 12-month observation period. Those admitted with an acutely painful diagnosis were almost twice as likely to have an AMA discharge, and for patients with multiple admissions, rates of acutely painful diagnoses increased with each admission coinciding with a cascading pattern of worsening infectious morbidity over time. Chronic pain diagnoses were inconsistent for those patients with multiple admissions, appearing, for the same patient, in one admission but not others; those with inconsistent documentation of chronic pain were substantially more likely to self-discharge.
PainRelief.com: What should readers take away from your report?
Response: These findings underscore the importance of aggressive and effective pain care in disrupting a process of self-directed discharge, intensifying harm, and preventable financial cost and suffering. Each admission represents a potential opportunity to provide harm reduction and treatment interventions addressing both substance use and pain.
PainRelief.com: What recommendations do you have for future research as a result of this work?
Response: Future research should be aimed at evaluating approaches for effective pain management in patients with opioid related disorders. These patients may present with high levels of opioid analgesic tolerance and opioid-induced hyperalgesia, suggesting that non-opioid analgesic approaches may be warranted to effectively manage their pain. Regardless of the specific pain management approach employed, patients with opioid-related disorders should believe that their complaints of pain are taken seriously and managed aggressively to maximize duration of hospital stay.
Citation:
Compton, P., Aronowitz, S.V., Klusaritz, H. et al. Acute pain and self-directed discharge among hospitalized patients with opioid-related diagnoses: a cohort study. Harm Reduct J 18, 131 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-021-00581-6
[last-modified]
The information on PainRelief.com is provided for educational purposes only, and is in no way intended to diagnose, cure, or treat any medical or other condition. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health and ask your doctor any questions you may have regarding a medical condition. In addition to all other limitations and disclaimers in this agreement, service provider and its third party providers disclaim any liability or loss in connection with the content provided on this website.
PainRelief.com Interview with: Dr Deanne Jenkin PhD UNSW Australia, now Research Fellow at The Daffodil Centre Sydney, Australia
Dr Jenkin
PainRelief.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Response: At the time, long-term opioid use for chronic non-cancer pain was increasing and there were signs that their benefit was overestimated whilst the harms were underestimated. Our randomized trial found that after going home from fracture surgery, strong opioids were not better for pain relief compared to a milder, potentially safer opioid alternative.
PainRelief.com Interview with: Deepak Kumar, PT, PhD Assistant Professor, Physical Therapy Assistant Professor, BU School of Medicine Director, Movement & Applied Imaging Lab
Dr. Kumar
PainRelief.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Response: We investigated the association of physical therapy interventions with long-term opioid use in people who undergo total knee replacement surgery. For people with advanced osteoarthritis, total knee replacement is the only option. The number of total knee replacement surgeries has been increasing and is expected to rise exponentially over the next few years with an aging population and rising rates of obesity. However, up to a third of patients continue to experience knee pain after this surgery. Also, a significant proportion of people become long-term opioid users after total knee replacement. Reliance on opioids may reflect a failure of pain management in these patients. Given that physical therapy interventions are known to be effective at managing pain due to knee osteoarthritis, we wanted to study whether physical therapy before or after surgery may reduce the likelihood of long-term opioid use.
We used real-world data from insurance claims for this study. In our cohort of about 67,000 patients who underwent knee replacement between 2001-2016, we observed that, receiving physical therapy within 90 days before surgery or outpatient physical therapy within 90 days after surgery were both related to lower likelihood of long-term opioid use later. We also observed that initiating outpatient physical therapy within 30 days and 6 or more sessions of physical therapy were associated with reduced likelihood of long-term opioid use compared to later initiation or fewer PT sessions, respectively. However, we did not see an association between type of physical therapy. i.e., active (e.g., exercsise) vs. passive (e.g., TENS) and long-term opioid use.
Importantly, most of our findings were consistent for people who had or had not used opioids previously. We also were able to account of a larger number of potential factors that could confound these associations because of the large sample size. However, there are limitations to our work. Since we only had access to insurance claims data but not to health records, we are unable to make any inferences about association of physical therapy with pain or quality of life, etc.
Zhishun Liu, MD, PhD Guang’anmen Hospital China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Beijing, China
PainRelief.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Response: Pharmacologic therapy has so far failed to reveal universal benefits in patients with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS); the evidence for acupuncture is limited, although it is also recommended in current guidelines.
PainRelief.com Interview with: Beth Darnall, PhD Director, Stanford Pain Relief Innovations Lab Associate Professor, Stanford University School of Medicine Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (by courtesy) Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute (affiliate faculty) Palo Alto, CA 94304
Dr. Darnall
PainRelief.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Best pain care integrates patient education and tools to help them manage pain and reduce their symptoms1. Multi-session psychological or “behavioral” pain treatment approaches, such as 8-session cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), are effective for equipping people with pain management skills. However, our prior research showed that patient access to these treatments is often poor, in part due to the costs and time burdens (e.g., up to 16 hours of treatment time).2
Findings from our study suggest that a one-time 2-hour pain relief skills class (“Empowered Relief”) was non-inferior to 8-session CBT for reducing multiple symptoms, including pain catastrophizing, pain intensity, and pain interference at 3 months post-treatment. We also found the single-session pain class imparted substantial reductions for pain bothersome, sleep disturbance, anxiety, fatigue and depression.
PainRelief.com Interview with: Ben Alter, MD, PhD Assistant Professor Director, Translational Pain Research Division of Pain Medicine Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Dr. Ben Alter
PainRelief.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Response: In the clinical environment, I am often asking patients where their pain is. There is a large amount of research establishing that widespread or “all-over” pain is difficult to manage and impacts nearly every aspect of a patient’s life. In fact, a tally of body areas is involved with the diagnosis of fibromyalgia, although this is not the only diagnostic criteria. What wasn’t clear to us was whether patterns of pain across the body also impacted important facets of the pain experience.
PainRelief.com Interview with: Andrew D. Hershey, MD, PhD, FAAN, FAHS Endowed Chair and Director of Neurology Professor of Pediatrics and Neurology Director, Headache Center Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center Cincinnati, OH 45229 University of Cincinnati, College of Medicine
PainRelief.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: Migraine is a common and debilitating disease, affecting 1 in 10 children and adolescents worldwide. Refractory migraine in adolescents may be associated with poorer academic performance, reduced school attendance, and a negative effect on social interactions. Current acute treatments for adolescents with migraine are mostly pharmacological. These treatments may cause side effects, and their frequent use may potentially lead to medication overuse headache. Additionally, their efficacy may be variable or inadequate. Thus, there is a great unmet need for new safe and effective acute treatments for adolescents with migraine headaches.
Remote Electrical Neuromodulation (REN) is a non-pharmacological, non-invasive neuromodulatory treatment that has been approved by the US FDA for acute treatment of the headache attacks of migraine in patients 12 years of age or older. The REN device (Nerivio®) is a small stimulator controlled by the user via a smartphone application and activates one of the body’s own pain suppression system by inducing weak electrical currents. These currents stimulate nerve fibers in the upper arm to activate an endogenous descending pain inhibition mechanism termed Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM). Clinical trials of REN have shown efficacy and safety of the treatment in adolescents 12 and older, as well as in adults.
The current study is the first to compare REN and standard-care treatments (over the counter medications and triptans) in adolescents.
Joseph Albert Karam, MD Assistant Professor of Clinical Orthopaedic Surgery Associate Program Director, Orthopaedic Surgery Residency The University of Illinois at Chicago
Dr. Karam
PainRelief.com: What is the background for this study?Would you describe the multimodal pain plan?
Response: Pain after joint replacement surgery has been historically managed by protocols centered on opioid medication. Given the side effects associated with these medications, the risk for long term addiction and evidence showing that opioids are not necessarily the best at treating pain perioperatively in joint replacement, multimodal pain management protocols have been established. These protocols utilize different families of medications that target pain at different steps in the pain pathway.
The exact protocol varies from one institution to the other but typically include systemic agents such as acetaminophen, non-steroidal anti-inflammatories/COX-2 inhibitors, gabapentinoids, corticosteroids, as well as loco-regional interventions such as local infiltration analgesia and regional nerve blocks. ‘Pre-emptive analgesia’ which most commonly uses a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory, acetaminophen and/or a gabapentinoid has also been demonstrated to play a key role. Additional measures such as NMDA antagonists and epidural catheters can also be used in select cases. Non-pharmacological treatments such as cryotherapy, cryoneurolysis and electrical nerve stimulation have also been described. Our preferred institutional protocol is detailed in the paper.
PainRelief.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: We became interested in looking at trunk position during running because one of us (Daniel Lieberman) had anecdotally observed people running with a variety of trunk positions, and when we went looking for academic literature on the topic, we found it was fairly scarce. We suspected that trunk position could have a major impact on the forces experienced by the lower limbs during running and even affect aspects of gait (stride length and time). So we developed a model predicting how these forces and movements might change as trunk flexion/forward leaning increased.
Our primary predictions were that more forward lean would increase “overstride” which is the distance in side view between the hip and the heel as it contacts the ground (a measure of how far your are extending your leg when you step). This in turn would increase the impact forces experienced by the lower limb at initial contact which have previously been shown to increase the risk of repetitive stress injuries. We also predicted that stride would get longer and take more time because extending the leading leg out farther forward (overstriding) would be necessary to keep the body center of mass within a base of support above the limbs. This more extended limb, we predicted, would change the angles and forces about the ankle, knee and hip joints.
The information on PainRelief.com is provided for educational purposes only, and is in no way intended to diagnose, endorese, cure, or treat any medical or other condition. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health and ask your doctor any questions you may have regarding a medical condition. In addition to all other limitations and disclaimers in this agreement, service provider and its third party providers disclaim any liability or loss in connection with the content provided on this website. None of the content on PainRelief.com is warranted by the editors or owners of PainRelief.com or Eminent Domains Inc.
Thank you for visiting PainRelief.com
Senior Editor, Marie Benz MD.
For more information, or for advertising options please email: [email protected] or [email protected]
