Novel Analgesic for Pain Relief Lacks Liver Toxicity

PainRelief.com Interview with:
Hernan Bazan, MD DFSVS FACS
CEO & Co-founder, South Rampart Pharma, LLC and
Professor of Surgery, Section of Vascular/Endovascular Surgery
Program Director, Vascular Surgery Fellowship
Ochsner Clinic 
New Orleans, LA  70121

Thank you for your kind invitation and opportunity to commend on our paper in press in the European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry entitled ‘A novel pipeline of 2-(benzenesulfonamide)-N-(4-hydroxyphenyl) acetamide analgesics that lack hepatotoxicity and retain antipyresis.’  This is the culmination of a multi-disciplinary effort involving investigators from the United States in Spain in search for a solution to the problem of treating pain more safely.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0223523420305729?via%3Dihub

As a disclosure, I am the CEO and co-founder of South Rampart Pharma, LLC (https://southrampartpharma.com), which is developing its lead asset to advance the treatment of pain by developing new, small-molecule solutions that have the potential to overcome many risks associated with current pain medicines.  

Dr. Hernan Bazan
Dr. Hernan Bazan

PainRelief.com:  What is the background for this study?

Response: The work in this paper is in large part due to several active and productive collaborations to address a simple problem: introduce a safer way to treat pain. That is, without the risk of opioids (abuse potential), acetaminophen/paracetamol (liver toxicity) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)/ibuprofen (kidney toxicity).

In 2018, over two million U.S. adults had opioid use disorder (OUD), which includes the misuse of prescription pain relievers and use of heroin (1).  Prescription pain reliever misuse was the second most common form of illicit drug use in the U.S. in 2018, after marijuana use, with 3.6% of the population misusing pain relievers(1).  In the U.S., pain affects more adults than diabetes and cancer combined with an estimated cost to the healthcare system of $635 billion/year(2).  Current pain medications are either addictive (e.g., opioids), hepatotoxic (e.g., ApAP) or nephrotoxic (e.g., NSAIDs). For example,  Paracetamol (or acetaminophen) (ApAP) is effective for acute pain but its hepatotoxicity risk limits its use to a short time period (usually < 3 days) and also its use in patients with compromised liver function or the elderly.   The prevalence of OUD, including high rates of overdose in the U.S., OUD costs and toxicity profiles of currently available medications underscore the need for a safer, effective non-opioid pain medication.

ApAP-hepatotoxicity remains the most common cause of acute liver failure in the U.S. with inadvertent hepatotoxicity the etiology in half of all cases(3).  Our aim was to overcome this toxicity by creating ApAP analogs linking a saccharin moiety to the methyl group of ApAP. To this, an efficient synthesis was possible through opening the ring of the heterocyclic moiety to supply the corresponding N-substituted amides(4, 5).  Within this molecule, the benzenesulfonamide fragment makes the molecule stable and moderately lipophilic and the R1 and R2 groups can be varied to effect lipophilicity (Fig). 

Figure. Fragments encompassing the novel non-narcotic, 2-(benzenesulfonamide)-N-(4-hydroxyphenyl) acetamide analgesic.

This paper describes the rationale for this synthesis, the library of compounds used to select the lead compounds to develop, the consistent lack of hepatotoxicity cell lines and small animals, and its ability to reduce pain and fever in small animal studies. Moreover, we explain the mechanisms of action for the lack of hepatotoxicity.



Study Evaluates Inhaled Cannabis for Pain Relief from Headache and Migraine

PainRelief.com Interview with:
Carrie Cuttler, Ph.D.
Assistant ProfessorWashington State University
Department of Psychology
Pullman, WA, 99164-4820

PainRelief.com:  What is the background for this study?

Response: Many people report using cannabis for headache and migraine and claim that it is effective in reducing their symptoms. However, to date there has only been one clinical trial examining the effectiveness of a cannabinoid drug called Nabilone (synthetic THC that is orally administered) on headache. The results of that trial indicated that Nabilone was more effective than ibuprofen in reducing pain and increasing quality of life. There have also been a couple of preclinical (animal) studies suggesting that cannabinoids like THC may be beneficial in the treatment of migraine. But there are surprisingly few studies examining the effectiveness of cannabis, particularly whole plant cannabis rather than synthetic cannabinoids on headache and migraine.

Continue reading

Tanezumab for Chronic Low Back Pain Relief: Phase 3 study

“Tanezumab is a monoclonal antibody that is part of an investigational class of non-opioid chronic pain medications known as nerve growth factor (NGF) inhibitors.” Link

“Tanezumab 2.5 mg administered subcutaneously (SC), which is being evaluated for patients with chronic pain due to moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis (OA) who have experienced inadequate pain relief with other analgesics.” Link

Comments from Pfizer regarding the study of Tanezumab for chronic low back pain, July 21 2020.

Pfizer and Lilly made the decision to prioritize tanezumab as a potential treatment for osteoarthritis, based on an assessment of the totality of SC tanezumab data and an initial discussion with the FDA.

At this time, regulatory submissions are not planned for tanezumab in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic low back pain (CLBP), but we recognize the significant patient needs and intend to maintain an open dialogue with regulatory authorities on potential future regulatory pathways for tanezumab. Additional data analyses, and potentially further clinical study, may be required to more fully characterize tanezumab in CLBP patients.

Additional information:

Alliance announced in early March that the U.S. FDA accepted the regulatory submission for Tanezumab, a potential first-in-class treatment for patients with chronic pain due to moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis.

Citation:

Markman, John D.a,*; Bolash, Robert B.b; McAlindon, Timothy E.c; Kivitz, Alan J.d; Pombo-Suarez, Manuele; Ohtori, Seijif; Roemer, Frank W.g,h; Li, David J.i; Viktrup, Larsj; Bramson, Candacek; West, Christine R.k; Verburg, Kenneth M.k Tanezumab for chronic low back pain, PAIN: June 25, 2020 – Volume Articles in Press – Issue – doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001928

Neck Pain Relief Utilizing Progressive Resistance Exercise

PainRelief.com Interview with:
ROSS ILES  
PhD, Dip WDP, BPhysio(Hons)
Insurance Work and Health Group
Senior Research Fellow Department of Physiotherapy
Adjunct Senior Lecturer,Health Services Division
School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine
Monash University Melbourne, VIC Australia

ROSS ILES  PhD, Dip WDP, BPhysio(Hons) Insurance Work and Health Group Senior Research Fellow Department of Physiotherapy Adjunct Senior Lecturer Health Services Division School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine Monash University Melbourne, VIC Australia
Dr. ILES

PainRelief.com:  What is the background for this study

Response: Chronic neck pain is estimated to have a worldwide mean lifetime prevalence of 48.5%, and the pain and disability associated with this condition accounts for 2.5% of the total years lost to disability in Australia. Chronic neck pain is known to be associated with neck muscle weakness in all planes of movement of up to 66% when compared to participants presenting with no history of neck pain. Therefore, neck strengthening exercises are commonly utilised in the treatment of chronic neck pain, with many different programs being described within the literature. Studies investigating the effect of strengthening exercises on chronic neck pain have found a short to intermediate term improvement in pain by a moderate to large amount. However, many strengthening programs do not target the multi-directional weakness which has been shown to be prevalent in this population group.

Through a case series of patients with chronic neck pain we aimed to determine whether a neck-specific progressive resistance program targeting all planes of cervical movement led to a change in pain and disability, and to investigate the relationship between neck strength, pain, and disability.

Data analysis was performed on patients after completing nine sessions of a neck-specific progressive resistance exercise intervention utilising the Melbourne Protocol and the Multi-Cervical Unit (MCU) technology under supervision of the treating physiotherapist. Participants completed isotonic exercises against the MCU provided resistance in the planes of cervical flexion, extension, and lateral flexion, all at neutral cervical rotation and 25 degrees left and right. Neck pain and disability were assessed with the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and Neck Disability Index (NDI) respectively, with neck strength measured and recorded through the MCU.

Study Finds Patients Feel Empowered By Interventions for Pain Relief

PainRelief.com Interview with:

Johan Hambraeus, MD
Board certified in anesthesiology, family medicine & Pain management
Department of Epidemiology and Global Health
Umeå University, Sweden

PainRelief.com:  What is the background for this study?

Response: When working with interventional pain management a striking feature is that all procedures are painful. It is often discussed about sedation before procedures, but whether to provide sedation seems to be more based on the local tradition than on facts. And it is not seldom that patients describe that they have phobic fear of needles, but despite this they cope with the interventional pain management and all the painful procedures.

Therefore we wanted to understand how it is felt and how the patients describe their experiences.

Continue reading

Study Evaluates Effects of Inhaled Cannabis for Pain Relief in Adults With Sickle Cell Disease

PainRelief.com Interview with:

Donald I. Abrams, MD
Division of Hematology-Oncology
Department of Medicine,
Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital
University of California, San Francisco

PainRelief.com:  What is the background for this study?  What are the main findings?

Response: A number of years ago, Kalpna Gupta, PhD, an investigator then at the University of Minnesota, came and told me about her mice with Hemoglobin SS who experienced pain that responded to laboratory cannabinoids. She was going to apply for a grant from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute to continue her studies and sought us out because of our prior clinical trials with cannabis and pain. Dr. Gupta wanted to include a pilot proof of principle human study in her application and asked if we could design one. As cannabidiol (CBD) was just becoming known at that time, we suggested to do a study in patients with sickle cell disease and pain looking at a delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)-dominant strain of inhaled cannabis, a CBD-dominant strain, a balanced 1:1 strain and placebo. She said that we would only have funds to do a two-arm study, one of which needed to be placebo. As we had already shown that there was a trend for vaporized cannabis that was predominantly THC to add to the analgesic effect of sustained-release opioids in patients with chronic pain, we chose to investigate a 4.4% THC:4.9% CBD product obtained from the National Institute on Drug Abuse.

We designed a crossover trial so that each participant would spend two 5-day inpatient stays separated by at least a month in our Clinical Research Center at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital. During one stay they would add vaporized cannabis to their stable ongoing analgesic regimen and during the other stay they would inhale placebo cannabis three times a day. We use the Volcano vaporizer device that heats the plant material and not an oil as has become popular in the recent “vaping” craze. Our target was to enroll 35 patients with sickle cell disease and chronic ongoing pain on an opioid-containing regimen. Our primary endpoint was change in pain as measured by way of a visual analog scale and the Brief Pain Inventory as well as safety.

Continue reading

Which Back Pain Patients Get Pain Relief from Yoga?

PainRelief.com Interview with:
Eric J. Roseen, DC, MSc
Department of Family Medicine
Boston University School of Medicine
Department of Rehabilitation Science
Massachusetts General Hospital Institute of Health Professions
Boston, MA 02215

PainRelief.com:  What is the background for this study?  What are the main findings?

Response: The Back to Health Study is a noninferiority randomized controlled trial of yoga, physical therapy, and back pain education for chronic low back pain. Participants were recruited from a SafetyNet hospital (Boston Medical Center) and seven affiliated federally-qualified community health centers. Participants reflected the population served by this health system, they were predominately low-income and non-white.

The yoga intervention consisted of 12 group-based, weekly, 75-minute, hatha yoga classes incorporating poses, relaxation and meditation exercises, yoga breathing and yoga philosophy. Thirty minutes of daily home practice was encouraged and supported with at-home yoga supplies. The physical therapy intervention consisted of 15 one-on-one 60-minute appointments over 12 weeks. During each appointment, the physical therapist utilized the Treatment-Based Classification Method and supervised aerobic exercise, while providing written instructions and supplies to continue exercises at home. The self-care intervention consisted of reading from a copy of The Back Pain Handbook, a comprehensive resource describing evidence-based self-management strategies for chronic lower back pain including stretching, strengthening, and the role of psychological and social factors. Participants received check-in calls regarding the reading every three weeks.

The main findings from the trial published in Annals of Internal Medicine found that yoga was non-inferior to physical therapy in terms of pain and function outcomes.

In this study published in Pain Medicine, we wanted to dig deeper and understand the characteristics of patients who tended to do better no matter what treatment they received (i.e., predictors) and characteristics that modified the likelihood that they would improve with a particular treatment (i.e., treatment effect modifiers). This type of information is useful to patients and clinicians who are trying to decide which type of treatment may be best for a unique individual experiencing back pain.

Continue reading

Pain Relief Patch Significantly Reduced Moderate to Severe Chronic Pain

PainRelief.com Interview with:
Peter Hurwitz
President
Clarity Science, LLC

Clarity Science Logo. (PRNewsFoto/Clarity Science)

PainRelief.com:  What is the background for this study?

Response: Over the past several years, there has been a big push from healthcare professionals and patients to identify alternative pain management treatments and multimodal approaches that have been shown to have minimal side effects for those who experience mild to moderate and chronic pain conditions. These strategies may include non-pharmacological and pharmacological therapies. Topical therapies have been shown to address various pain conditions with minimal side effects as compared to oral over-the-counter (OTC) agents, prescription NSAIDs, and prescription opioids. T

his IRB-approved study evaluated whether a topical analgesic pain-relieving patch containing methyl salicylate (10%), Menthol (6%) and Camphor (3.1%) could reduce pain severity and improve function in patients over the course of 14 days.

Furry Social Robots May Provide Some Pain Relief

­PainRelief.com Interview with:

­ Shelly Levy-Tzedek, PhD
Head of the Cognition, Aging and Rehabilitation Lab
Faculty of Health Sciences, Dept. of Physical Therapy 
& The Zlotowski Center for Neuroscience
& ABC Robotics Initiative
The Ben Gurion University of the Negev

Prof. Levy-Tzedek

PainRelief.com:  What is the background for this study?  What are the main findings?

Response: It is known that close, effective human touch can help alleviate pain. We set out to test whether touch interaction with a social robot can also reduce the sensation of pain. We found that it does: young, healthy people who touched the robot during the application of painful stimuli reported feeling less pain than when it was in the room with them (with no direct contact), or when it was not present at all. They also reported increased levels of happiness. 

Continue reading

Which Older Adults Use Cannabis for Chronic Pain Relief?

PainRelief.com Interview with:
Julie Bobitt, PhD

Director, Interdisciplinary Health Sciences
University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign
Champaign, IL. 61820

Dr. Julie Bobitt
Dr. Julie Bobitt

PainRelief.com:  What is the background for this study?

Response: Our previous research found that older adults, who we interviewed, used cannabis primarily for pain related reasons and that they were reporting using cannabis to reduce or altogether stop their use of opioids.  We wanted to further study this and we wanted to see if there were any differences between self-reported pain in non-cannabis users vs. cannabis users and then if there were differences between groups who used cannabis alone versus those who used opioids alone, versus cannabis in combination with opioids.